Cinema, good cinema, bad movies, different things. You can talk about the works of cinema about the works of cinema, argue, kill each other, and still, there will be about a million and another match for discussion. Why is it needed? To satisfy the internal values, which we are often ready to sacrifice our own time, to get pleasure, so that our lost time has passed and we had something to recall, tell.
Films are such a category of art, which almost everyone loves, units relate to film production, approximately as they would belong to their left slipper, despite the fact that the owner of the right -hander. I carry nonsense as always, in general okay. What I want to tell about. In essence, I am such a person who divides everything into black and white, for me there is only good or only bad, so I divide all films into “Oh yes, good cinema”, or “Fu What cinema, why did I only have a hierarch”.
But there is also such a category of films that I just adore, but I have no desire to review them. And now, I would like to tell you about some of them, and at the same time throw you, my dear bloggers, a small topic for discussion.
1. I am a legend.
At that time I was not a big fan of Will Smith and for me he was just a black actor from that film with Tommy Lee Jones, well, where they were still against aliens. Therefore, especially passionately for the next film, which was recorded on the blank of the company Fuji, I took no more than in any way. Then my opinion changed and until the end of my lives and minutes I am a fan of Will. "I am a legend" tells us about a man who should live and enjoy alone. At its core, the film is not at all about vampires, not about monsters, a film about a person who is trying to survive, who is trying to at least somehow come to terms with the death of his family, around nobody … he is only one. And so he is so beautiful, walks, runs, searches for the survivors, and next to him his friend. Dog.
And because of this dog I can’t review this truly awesome film. I hate the scene where the dog is killed, the dog … which is not much saving the life of its owner and dies so tragically. Cats still like it, as I recall this damn thing. Therefore, this film begins on this list. I adore it, I want to review it over and over again, but I can’t. I do not want to re -experience the very emotions, I do not want to watch how they kill this dog.
2. Hachiko: The most faithful friend
You have heard about such an expression as "men do not cry"? Personally, I heard, and I also heard the continuation and it says the following "they sob". Hachiko is not about the dog, he is about love and fidelity, a film about true friendship between man and dog. Who does not know or watched this film, I’ll say in a brief that a movie about how a man picked up a homeless puppy of the Akita-Inu breed and made a friendship with him, brought him to his family … then la topol, Lamur Tuzhur, meeting at the station, escorting home and to work, but all the moment he fell out of the train, the owner did not leave the train carriage. But Hachiko did not stop, he continued to meet the owner from year to year (I hope who did not look, he realized that the owner was dead). If there are those who did not sob at the end of the film, then you are either intricate churbans, or the train has moved and your whole body is deprived of the ability to watch and feel. I love this film, I love it with all my heart, but I will never watch it again.
The second film and again about the dog you ask? Maybe I have this one, because I have lived with me since childhood. So cool, Doberman-Pincher breeds. But not from the category that bite off a delicate piece of the meat of a neighbor’s thigh, but the one who goes to the pillow … On the bed, when its owners get up early in the morning from the same bed. By the way, she tragically died at the age of 10 years.
3. Golden Compass.
Imagine this situation: you look at the first part of the lord of the rings. We looked? I liked it? And all on this, there will be neither the second part, nor the third, there will be no continuation, because the film simply did not pay off … Moreover, the fees of this very lord of the rings led to the fact that the New Line Cinema studios had to go bankrupt (I don’t need to throw data from the KinoPoisk here, the film is considered conditionally pernotched if he will collect as much money at home or so much money. that even the avatar envied). What does the lord of the rings have to do with it?
Yes, thank God, I just gave a clear example on a better famous tape than this. I am sure that not everyone liked the first part of the trilogy of the dark began, but I wildly drove this film, reviewed it many times and each time I thought out of me that there is a pity that there is no second and third part, it is a pity that such good trilogies are stored on the first part, especially when all three parts are interconnected with each other. Of course, I then bought the entire trilogy in the book version, but the sediment after the shortage of the movie trilogy remained.
4. Cold heart
One of my favorite cartoons Rapunzel, so it is not difficult to guess that from the authors of this same shaggy girl, the cartoon of a cold heart, I expected very much, when I saw the first trailer, I even washed down a topic on Stopgime in honor of his exit. I liked everything, laughter, atmosphere, cool such deer and snowman. This is where all the insidiousness of the tape lies, because of which I do not want to view it again. I have already spoke more than once and repeat again … although not, I just throw this comment that reflects the whole problem because I do not want to review this amazing cartoon.
The cold heart is www.casinoyako.co.uk an awesome cartoon with a cool drawing, but just disgusting with a fagot voice of the alof (that’s the kind of named that snowman).
5. Prince of Persia: Sands of Time
In 2010, I still did not have a good Internet, so I learned about all the new items either by city posters, or in the cinemas themselves, where new products are so kindly showing us before watching the next cinema. Once again, having gone to work, I just screeched with joy, seeing the stunningly beautiful postthy of the film adaptation of the famous and me to the madness of the adored trilogy of the sands of time.
And for some reason at that moment I thought about the second part at that time, how dark and amazingly beautiful. Producer Jerry Brookhaimer has not tarnished (Lord I hope I wrote this word correctly) still my reputation by all sorts "Pupils of the sorcerer" And "Lonely Rangers" was listed in producers, which could not but cause even more admiration. From this moment I waited and believed that the film would like a game to cause me a feeling of admiration and joy.
So Stop, you have not forgotten that I really liked the movie "Prince of Persia"? Yes, moreover, I really liked it. This is a film … A beautiful fairy tale about heroes, about love, about courage … But … but not about the very prince of Persia, who ran, jumped, rode and which we loved so much. The film is very good and unconditionally advise everyone to watch it, but there is no that atmosphere in it, there is no blood-piece (eh Disney), there is some kind of blind from silicone, who, except to move her puffy lips backwards back, does not know how to move anything. I remember that mixed feeling left after watching in the cinema: the film seems to be cool, but I don’t want to review. I do not want first of all due to loss, I love the trilogy of sand so that I do not want to return to this work at all. What did the film not enough? I think that first of all that Disney shot it … An excellent studio, one of the best, but shooting their films for those spectators whose mothers or dads will not be shocked by tearing flesh and spilled from it of blood liters and intestines.
Thank you all for your attention.
And also, today is the birthday of a wonderful actor and today he would be 89 years old. He is for me as a sign of good cinema, so I will not post naked girls in the positive with your permission, and I have a scrapping in it of a magnificent actor, who unfortunately not with us today.
The best comments
I agree with Hachiko. I will never revise for the same reasons.
From his:
“Fox and Hunting Dog” is the old cartoon of Disney … He is the best, but I didn’t even sob on Hatiko. Actually, the reason is the same.
"Escape from the show -shoe" – there is a category of films whose salt is in a denouement/morality/riddle. T.e. which to review after you know what salt is – well, I don’t really want to (there are exceptions, but they are rare). Here is the "Escape from the Showson". Wonderful film, but morality is already known. And to revise all the hardships of the prison life of the GG there is no desire. “Disappeared”, “prestige” (I remembered because it is fresh in memory), for example, they also fall into the category of such films, I will not revise them.
“Diserfielding waves” – I agree with Andrei that the films of Lars von Trier are, in principle, not for repeated views. I am a fan, so this does not concern me ("Antichrist", for example, revised 4 times). But “dissecting the waves” just that film … I was very unpleasant when watching and I do not want to repeat this feeling.
Well, t.p. and t.D., If you strain strongly, then you can remember such films more than a dozen 🙂
Yak the last Lyalka was tutored)))
Stars on the ground
Go and look
… and in my soul I dance
Time of gypsies
Mary and Max
The same Münghausen
Green mile
The lights of the big city
In general, this is a brief list of films that I do not want to review, because I will never experience the same feelings that I experienced during the first viewing.
Never, I will never revise most of my childhood films. I still have the most remarkable memories of them, but when I tried to view them as an adult … No, let them remain in my memory just so cool awesome. Endless story, myo, my myo who set up Roger’s rabbit, white fang, ninja turtles, and many others, thank you for the unforgettable moments of my childhood, but now you seem too naive to me.
By the way, this is the first topic in the development of which my wife helped me! Thanks to her for that! Well, this is so … by the way)))
And I’m all sting, when there will be a continuation of the “compass”, but it means how …: (at one time I liked Pulman’s books (by the way, in his second series about Sally Lokhart, films were also shot, only in the format for TV), it is a pity that he could not repeat the success of Harry Potter, at least a little ..
About the films that I like, I do not like to review films for some reason at all. Here are the books to re -read – always please, I re -read the same GP once each, well, maybe the last book is only less, and I watched the films a maximum of 2 times.
Here I have a film that I will not review.
This is the film "Seven", Director-David Fincher., The film is very pressed on the atmosphere and the best option for watching it in the dark, and the ending simply killed me on the sulfur, but unfortunately because of the same atmosphere and its loss in subsequent views, I personally do not want to watch it anymore, although the film is magnificent, but spaces, but radiantly radiant.
PS personal me (My opinion may not coincide with your) думаю можно отнести большинство триллеров с очень классной развязкой, к фильмам на один раз.(although there is always a way out, to wolve and look at the film and cheer for the hero who will die in five seconds, although you knew about it when he would die right now, thank you all, watch class films.
So the fact that I do not want to review them and will never do it, although then they were one of the most beloved for me. And where I wrote that I want to see them again?
But I recently decided to turn it on the background of the background for cleaning in the room and for five minutes I sat down under it for a seagull to grab it in advance … Well, what can I say, I have already started under the credits> _
And my love for Will Smith began with the movie "Me, Robot". But this does not apply to the case. Well, in general, not to revise the cold heart that the snowman liked it because of the voice is cool! But, partly, I understand (I was tormented at one time in search of old films in the “correct” voice acting, because the voices are not possible to watch). Yes, it’s a shame.
And in the case, the prince of Persia – here. The film is theoretically good, beautiful, interesting, but practically, like a big fan of the sand trilogy, I hurt my disk on the shelf and I will never watch it. The wrong prince turned out, not the same. But he does not belong to my beloved. I thought here, and I have no favorite films that I would not watch. There are only you like. Here are some of them seven lives (all with the same Will Smith)-I really liked the film sooo, and if I ever watch it again, then only when there will be a desire to cry globally.
And I almost forgot about the compass! In general, this film is not to say that I liked it. But the lack of continuation was saddened at one time 🙁 I wanted to see the second part. There was something interesting to begin. It’s a shame when they do the introduction to something global, and then they turn off.
By the way, you spoke about the escape and I remembered about “flying over the cuckoo’s nest” – I will never revise this dirty trick again in my life! T ___t t.e. She, of course, is a masterpiece and chic, but it was necessary at the end, I don’t even want to remember. In general, pain, sadness and sadness in the square and we no longer need such happiness. Although the film is wonderful!
No, I just make a mark in my head that since I did not like it both then and now – it means really “not my” movie.
The topic is not about what films you would like to revise, but about the fact that you would in no case be reviewed, despite all the steepness of these films)))
It is clear that the films I have listed are not the one that I like the most)
The cold heart is an awesome cartoon with a cool drawing, but just disgusting with a fagot voice of the alof (that’s the kind of named that snowman).
At this moment I stopped reading. WHAT. From behind the voice? Seriously? In my opinion, this is an unrealistically attracted pickup. Well, if you are shaking already, then look in the original in the end.
This is not at all attracted, it is so cool, so funny and this is one of the key characters. You would watch Shrek, for example, if a donkey voiced Borya Moiseev? Well, no. The voice acting of characters is one of the most important elements of the movie, it is important that the actors are selected as high quality as possible, and not as here.
I can’t revise what I already saw. Unless some comedy in the company of friends.